Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] new user

Subject: RE: [OM] new user
From: "Lou Riina" <lriina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 18:01:44 -0500
Joel
Do you mean that the 2.8 is actually lighter ie physically I need this for
medical work what do you think?
Lou

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Joel Wilcox
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 4:10 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] new user

Lou,

If you consider 100mm the ideal length for portraits, the 100/f2 would
generally be considered superior.  The lightness of the 100/f2.8 surely has
advantages, depending on how you shoot, and it is highly esteemed by many
Zuiks.

I like the 85/f2 for portraits. Some people also use the 90/f2 macro for
portraits.  None of the alternatives for $149 however. :-(

Joel Wilcox
Iowa City, Iowa USA

At 01:23 PM 11/20/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear all,
>How is a 100mm F2.8 used zuico for $149 USD and is this my best choice for
>portraits?
>Lou
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz