On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Dirk and Carla Wright wrote:
:At 10:11 PM -0800 11/11/99, Acer V wrote:
:><snip>
:>Affirmative to the claim that negs have more info than slides because of
:>wider exposure latitude. So says Michael Covington in his astrophoto book
:>anyways :-) Or was it Sky&Telescope?
:
:yeah, but do prints from negatives have wider latitude than prints from
:slides? They are different types of paper. This may not be an issue if you
:are feeding them into a film scanner.
Ah, yes, paper is the limiting factor.... You could sandwish three slides
or negs in photoshop, get midtone, hilite, and shadow, and print that ;-0
/Acer V
--
Whole Sort Of General Mish Mash <http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|