At 2:04 PM -0500 11/11/99, Ghosal, Ranjan (GEP) wrote:
> 75-200 f/2.8-3.5 Sigma (67)
this one gets my vote.
>
>I would like your input as to which one of these are worthy of putting on an
>Oly body. "Fast" and "slow" aside, I would like to know what you think of the
>optics, clarity, color rendition, contrast etc. Plus, do the large front
>diameters on some of these indicate a very large and heavy lens?
yeah, usually. unless it's a newer polycarbonate lens.
> I have read good things in the archive about Vivitar Series 1 and
>Tokina AT-X lenses, are these generally recognized to be decent lenses? What
>non-Zuiko lenses do you use when necessary?
>
I like Tamron and Sigma.
Be seeing you.
Dirk Wright
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|