| Subject: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos |
|---|---|
| From: | Christopher Biggs <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 06 Sep 1999 12:12:18 +1000 |
Acer Victoria <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the 'Net and
spake thusly:
> >>>But both a slide and a negative will hold more tonal range than can be
> printed. So the decision as to what part of the tonal range is to be
> printed has to be made by someone.<<<
>
> Even for Cibas?
Especially so. The some of the best cibacrome prints you will see
involved making a "contrast mask" (basically a thin monochrome
negative) which is sandwiched with the slide when exposing the print.
cjb
--
__
/ \
/ \
/MORONS\
/ \
\ next /
\ 15 /
\msgs/
\__/
||
||
||chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
One more infobahn cliche couldn't hurt...
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Looking for tripod advice, Acer Victoria |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2000 vs OM3, ALEXSCIFI |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, Acer Victoria |
| Next by Thread: | print latitude was Re: [OM] exposure for star photos, Acer Victoria |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |