Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Normal lens comparisons

Subject: Re: [OM] Normal lens comparisons
From: Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:06:44 -0600
At 01:37 AM 7/28/99 +0100, Keith Berry wrote:
>
>Jay Maynard wrote
>>No, I'm not referring to the bare facts, but rather a compilation of the
>>lore surrounding them...like the 50/1.8's superb all-around performance,
>the
>>55/1.2's reputed softness, etcetera.
>
>
>I'd be interested too. Any mention of a 50mm seems to invite flames from
>some Zuikoholics, perhaps because having spent a fortune on expensive glass,
>they don't like to be reminded that they could have excellent results from a
>$20 lens.


Not me.  I'm interested in any lens that gives me excellent results, regardless 
of the price (though I have both El Cheapos and Stratospheric Price Rangers in 
my kit...)  And yes, the Zuiko MC 50mm F/1.8 is a kick-ass lens.  Period.  
Shame it isn't my favourite focal length (28mm is rapidly gaining that 
distinction, along with either 90 or 100mm...).

Garth

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz