Jeff Borenstein <jsb@xxxxxxxx> moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly:
> I am 16 year old aspiring photographer. My dad has an old Olympus Om
> 2n, a 50mm 1.8 lens, 28 f3.5 lens, 135 3.5 lens, 80 - 200 lens (sigma), 35 -
> 70 (sigma), flash, etc. I will be taking photo 1 next year in high school,
> and I am going to Costa Rica this summer and am really looking forward to
> some great picture opportunities. My question is, the om 2000, reasonably
I recommend you imprison your father in the North Tower immediately,
relieving him of his OM gear first of course. Your (OM) empire
will then be on a safe footing, from which you can start to improve
your positition further.
Another body is always a good idea. (Zuikoholics anonymous, here I
come!). If you're concerned about reliability a new body might set
you at ease more than a used OM-1. Perhaps have the 2n serviced.
Insure everything for replacement value before you go!
cjb.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Christopher Biggs - Stallion Technologies - chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
-- --
The IEEE has monitored this electronic mail message, and asserts that no
energy was created or destroyed during its construction or transmission.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|