Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 100/2.8 or 85/2

Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2.8 or 85/2
From: Kenneth Sloan <sloan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 17:12:26 -0500
> 
> In a message dated 5/10/99 2:53:50 PM EST, siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> 
> << But how's the difference between these two? I can always move in
>  closer with the 85, but moving back would not be too easy all the time.
>  How much is 15mm anyway?
>   >>
> It certainly depends on the size of the location you have for taking 
> portraits. Try it with any brand zoom you have that covers 85 to say, 135mm. 
> See where you like to stand, where you _can_ stand due to size of room, 
> lighting conditions, etc, and note the lens setting. I chose 85mm to keep it 
> tight and intimate. A lot of people like 90 or 100mm. Some even like it all 
> the way up to 135mm. Whatever works for you and your situation is the right 
> answer for you.

It also depends (just a teeny bit) on the look you are after.  There is
a subtle difference between a 100 and an 85.  

But, I've taken effective portraits with a 24.  Notice that I said
"effective" - which is not necessarily the same thing as "flattering".

-- 
Kenneth Sloan                                            sloan@xxxxxxx
Computer and Information Sciences                       (205) 934-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham                 FAX (205) 934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170   http://www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/sloan/

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz