| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM vs Leica vs Zeiss--system versus system??? |
|---|---|
| From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 May 1999 13:10:24 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 5 May 1999 ALEXSCIFI@xxxxxxx wrote:
> So the question is this, if you are limited to just a single camera
> body and 3 lenses,
Leica M6
21/2.8
35/2.0
90/2.0
Why ? It fits my street shooting. Fast, incredibly
accurate focus, short lag time, sturdy.
Alternate ?
Contax G2 (in many ways the better picture-maker)
21/2.8
35/2.0
90/2.8
SLR ?
OM3ti
21/3.5
35/2.0
85/2.0
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Joel Wilcox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Adapters, Pablo Fernandez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM vs Leica vs Zeiss--system versus system???, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM vs Leica vs Zeiss--system versus system???, Richard Schaetzl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |