I'm quite new to the list and I'm also comtemplating getting the 180f2.8 but
I have read anything about caveat for this lens.
I would like to know views before I decide on the purchase.
Thank you
rgds
seongwan
kelton wrote:
> Gary did:
> >[OM] Lens Test: 100mm f/2 Zuiko
> Yay! Thanks for the two lens tests, Gary! Great stuff.
>
> BBB said:
> >I'm leaning towards a 180/2.8 for my next lens,
> Since I've only recently rejoined the list, you may have thoroughly
> discussed this already, but you've heard all the caveats about this lens,
> right? If you're still going to buy one however, despite the lore,
> there's one for sale not a block from my house in Los Angeles and I will
> check its price if you want.
>
> Also, Richard said:
> >The catch is that I believe, that Olympus has changed more than the
> >coating with some lenses, so SC and MC versions might not be comparable
> >in this respect.
> And this is what I've heard also, although I don't have a source to back
> it up. Could one of the sage elders enlighten us?
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|