Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus class action

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus class action
From: "Rand E. Tomcala" <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 22:38:17 -0500
Actually Susan, there is almost no difference in weight between the two
of them.  The QA310 weighs 330g and the T32 weighs 320g, but then again,
the 310 is more powerful with a GN of 34.  Not withstanding, your
inference to a certain singer is more than appropriate for both units.
Rand E.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scj9000@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
snip
> 
> You may snicker, Warren...but that's exactly what I have been doing! I just
> found another 310 flash (as i have lived in fear for 24 years that the shoe
> will crack off...it's such a heavy little dude!  I read the other night where
> someone was commenting on the weight of the T32...well..if you think it's top
> heavy, just try the ole 310. it's the Dolly Parton of flashes (did I really
> say that to  bunch of OM MEN??)  :=)
> 
snip
> Susan
> who thinks Charles' little grammatical thang was cute!
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz