John;
Another thought: check out the lens group on Sals page:
http://www.mcs.net/~smp/photo/oly.htm
and see the 90/2 and 50/3.5 plus links to specs.
George
John Hudson wrote:
>
> I recently signed onto this list and look forward to the conversation. I
> also recently acquired the following pieces of experienced Olympus
> equipment: OM 4T body, 28mm / 2.8, 50mm / 1.4, and 100mm / 2.8
>
> ......I am also looking to get the 50mm / f3.5 macro and would appreciate
> any comments pro and con as to its performance. I have been told that there
> is an Olympus non-bellows 90mm / f2 macro. Is that true and how does it
> compare with the 50mm / f3.5 macro?
>
> I have been a Leica M3 plus 35/50/90/135 user since the mid 1960s but
> decided to find a SLR as well. After much investigation the OM 4T looked
> like a pretty safe bet and I have not been disapointed. This Olympus brand
> looks like a well kept secret with superior results!
>
> jh
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|