Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Just how extensive is the T- Series? (brought on by seeing my f

Subject: RE: [OM] Just how extensive is the T- Series? (brought on by seeing my first T-18)
From: "Per Nordenberg" <per.nordenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 14:45:00 +0100
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Hans van Veluwen <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Till: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: den 17 december 1998 12:01
Ämne: Re: [OM] Just how extensive is the T- Series? (brought
on by seeing my first T-18)


>Steven R wrote:
>
>
>>Ok until today I knew about the F280 (not a T-Series,
naturally), the T-45,
>>T-32, T-28, T-20, T-10 and T-8 flashes (..)
>>And now I've run across the T-18 (curtesy of ebay).  It
doesn't
>>look like a particularly desirable flash, but I'm basing
this on a jpg that
>was
>>mailed to me.  (..)
>>"Just how cheap/useful is the T-18?"
>
>The T18 was intended for the OM-101 but can also be used
with other bodies
>providing TTL/OTF exposure if the body supports it. If not,
you only have
>manual (GN based) flash exposure. Allthough very limited in
its output and
>options, it is a nice flash to put in the bag "just in
case", because of its
>small size and weight. Besides the position and
construction of the shoe
>makes it less vulnerable than for instance the T20.



My memory tells me the T18 also can be compared to a T20
mounted on the OM flash extender (besides less output of
course). How is it that the position and construction of the
shoe makes it less vulnerable?

Per Nordenberg


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz