<<Another person has pointed out the MF options (Pentax 645) vs the 35mm
wonderbricks. The jury is still out on this one, but I have several
problems with that route: Lack of lens choices (extreme wide-angle, shift,
zooms and super-teles) and aweful flash-sync speeds. Otherwise, the Pentax
645-AF is extremely attractive. I keep flip-flopping back and forth on an
hourly basis on going MF instead of a killer 35mm system. Frankly, MF
would be cheaper. >>
Add to that, No long roll backs (that I know of) And lack of emergency
processing
if your usual lab is unavailable.
I like MF, however, It can't do much more for me than 35mm in most
situations.
Unless you need 16x20's or larger on a regular basis 35mm is the all around
choice
for dependability and versatility. ( two cents non refundable).
Charles Loeven
cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|