Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM2n s/n above 300,000 more desirable?

Subject: Re: [OM] OM2n s/n above 300,000 more desirable?
From: John Hermanson <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 16:59:07 -0500
I believe any 2N is more reliable than any plain 2.  But a plain 2 above
300,000 is  better than one below.  OM-2 production started at 100,000.
I believe 2Ns kicked in around 500,000.  The lowest 2N I have in my
repair records is 570,XXX.

John

GMcGrath@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Hi, all :-)
> I'm soliciting the knowledge of the group on this one:
> I just came across a couple of msgs. in the rec.photo newsgroups referring to
> the serial numbers of used OM2n's. Other than purely later date of
> manufacture, is there another reason to pay close attention to serial numbers?
> TIA.
> Greg
> 
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz