Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Is it that bad

Subject: Re: [OM] Is it that bad
From: "John Petrush" <petrush@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 18:58:16 -0700
I want for nothing.  I can photograph single celled organisms, a child's
smile or colliding galaxies with my OM system.  The latest models offer
convienence features that my OM's will probably never have like
auto-bracketing, auto fill-flash, TTL flash, and so on.  But the OM system
is peerless in the macro specialty, no slouch in the manual category, and a
dang fine **system** all over.  When I run out of ways to play with OM's,
maybe I'll try Nikon or Canon's latest do-dad gadgetry.  Till then, I
suppose these tired old manual. mechanical, pre-CAD design, pre ED glass
beasties will just have to do <VBG>.

John P
______________________________________
there is no "never" - just long periods of "not yet".


<EdMall@xxxxxxx> posed the question:


>What is it, exactly, that you want to do with the OM system that you cannot
do
>with the components readily available?




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz