| Subject: | Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction. |
|---|---|
| From: | PCACala@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Sep 1998 16:39:37 EDT |
FWIW, the 28 mm f/2.8 goes in there, too. Gary < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction., PCACala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Reciprocity failure and Olympus auto exposure, Shawn Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction., gma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Was Digital vs Film, is now Fawlty Towers and OM addiction., PCACala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |