>>Fine for controlling access to private property, but no way would I
cooperate
with this dictum in a public place. No photos of people or private property
taken could be used for advertising or other commercial uses without releases,
anyway. Editorial photography is protected by the First Amendment in the
U.S., no matter how much a government or private entity might wish to control
it for its own benefit.>>
You're saying because Central Park is a public place that they have no
right to ban anything legal elsewhere, even in viewing stands or aother
access-controlled areas? Certainly an interesting thought.
Regards,
Denton Taylor
_______________________________
Photogallery at www.dentontaylor.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|