Ahh, but is it Olympus' problem or should the film manufacturers keep an eye on
the reflectance of their films? ;-)
John
ONLYOLYBW@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In a message dated 7/2/98 10:20:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> ulf.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> << C.H.Ling wrote:
> >All OM4Ti owner here can try the following procedure to see if you have the
> >same problem or not.
> >
> >Load your 4Ti with a piece of film, focus on a blank wall, adjust the
> >aperture to let the exposure fall to below 1/60s. Set the memory on, note
> >the reading on shutter speed. Fire the camera and check the memorized
> >reading again. I think you will see around 1/3 to 1 stop different.
> Tried this with my OM4 (which has the OM4Ti circuitry, BTW), and, no, my
> readings before and after exposure are exactly the same, just below (one
> dot) on 1/30 s on F2 with the 90 mm macro. I even performed it twice, same
> result. Film was Fuji Sensia II Ulf Westerberg >>
>
> Hi Ulf,
> I reached the end of my Velvia roll yesterday trying CH's test so I reloaded
> with Sensia II and ran yours at 1/30th sec.. Sure enough, NO change @ 1/30
> sec. BUT, at 1/4 sec & 1/2 sec. YEP = + 2/3rd stop. This is 2/3 stop
> difference from my test yesterday with the Velvia = + 1 1/3rd stop, but still
> shows nearly the same results as C.H.Ling. It would be interesting if you can
> run your test again at 1/4,& 1/2 sec.
> It is starting to appear that our beloved Olympus OTF metering system is not
> so hot after all, at least with Velvia. One and 1/3rd stops overexposure is
> not acceptable at 1/4 sec. I agree with CH LIng, this should not be!
> BW
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|