Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM Preference Votes-Tally

Subject: Re: [OM] OM Preference Votes-Tally
From: "Marco" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Feb 98 22:36:42 +0100
On Lun, 9 feb 1998 7:30, Tomoko Yamamoto <mailto:tomokoy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
>1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
>features, a. one under $500, b. one ca. $700, and c. an OM-5 under $1500)
>would you buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You
>have to ask
>your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
>a. one under $500
> 20 people would buy at least one body in this price range.
>In addition:  1 conditional purchase
>                  2 OM-2
>                  3 OM-1
>                  3 Maybe
>b. one ca. $700 (non-Ti OM-4Ti)
>40 people would buy at least one body in this price range.
>In addition: 1 conditional (specific feature(s) needed)
>                 3 OM-2
>                 1 OM-1
>                 6 Maybe
>                 1 $800 improved OM-4Ti
>c.OM-5 under $1500
>30 people would buy an OM-5/6
>In addition: 3 conditional
>                 1 OM-3Ti with mirror lock-up
>                 5 Maybe

That means a majority of oly-users would buy one-two-three new bodies. That
is a good news for Olympus.
>
>2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be very honest.  You don't
>need to be realistic here.)
>Flat yes or no answers:  14 said yes and 44 said no.
>In addition: Yes  5 if Contax-type autofocusing mechanism
>                         6 if as long as a new AF body accepts manual OM
>Zuiko lenses
>                         2 if no or minimal size increase 
>     12 for focus assist (1 digital focus assist)

The good old OM77 scores 20 points.
>
>3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
>new features may be accommodated?
>
>Flat yes (11) and no (39)
>
>12 for a little (marginal, not much)
>5  for 100r more
>5  for less than 10%
>4  as long as full compatibility is maintained 
>1  probably
>1  film back
>1 if AF
>1 if Contax-like
>1 each digital back and film back
>1 if within grip size 
>1 if winder included size

more yes than no at last.
>
>>Rather than trying to make a summary, I would like EVERYONE to think what
>conclusions he/she will make out of this survey-votes.  Besides, I am too
>sleepy and tired to go on tonight.
>
>
Have a good rest! and OM-dreams!

Marco




############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
|   listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|    htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz