I think there is some error here. I was wondering why the OM2 is better. My
comment is the one after Doug's
Foxy
> Sir & Madam Foxcroft : ) : ) : )
>
> Please refresh our minds as to how the OM2N is better in macro flash? How
> did you confirm John H.'s post? I am on a scrounging campaign to build up a
> Oly macro system and would like to know the strengths and weaknesses of the
> OM XY's in this application.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Andre : ) : ) : )
> El Nino California
>
>
> >> DO NOT GET RID OF THE OM-2N. It works MUCH better for what you are doing.
> >> The OM-2N has much more range using TTL flash. John Hermanson posted such,
> >> and I confirmed it with mine. As a result, I sold my OM-4.
> >>
> >> Doug
> >
> >How does the 2N give better flash? Shouldn't the range be dependent upon the
> >flash GN?
> >
> >Foxy
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|