>1. Which one of the new OM bodies (OM reissues with possibly a few new
>features, one under $500, one ca. $700, and an OM-5 under $1500) would you
>buy in the next 2-5 years? Just one or two or all three? (You have to ask
>your own pocketbook and your buying habit.)
The OM-5 only. IMHO a new OM can not be sold under $1500.
>
>2.Would you like to have an autofocusing OM-x? (Be honest. You don't need
>to be realistic here.)
>
Yes, as long as my present lens collection can be used as well
>3. Would you be willing to have a somewhat larger OM body so that several
>new features may be accommodated?
>
Only if 'somewhat' is less than 5-6% (in volume, that is, not in
length, width and height separately).
>4. What is the single most important feature of the OM body that you would
>like to see retained? Please narrow your preferences down to the single
>feature. I will not count those votes with two items here.
>
Full backward system compatibility with other 1-digit numbered OM's.
Frank van Lindert.
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|