I hoped that some body would react to my post. I´m not a engineer or
technican, so it would be nice to have the opinion of a more qualified
list member.
I´d remember the discusion about the storage of flashes.
Richard
KFrohling wrote:
>
> Richard Schtzl wrote:
>
> [major snip]
>
> >The MS76 will live longer and let your OM body eat less batteries,
> >because of lower drain and higher capacity.
>
> [another major snip]
>
> Yikes! This is contrary to my experience. My OM-2 was extremely
> unreliable for most of the last decade *because* I was using MS76
> batteries. Since I switched to 357's, no problems. (this after
> several attempts at servicing and an overhaul) I was about to
> give up on the old Oly until I saw Lee Hawkins FAQ and John's
> Camtech web page, and discovered the really problem!
>
> Unless you have no other option, use 357 silver oxides! The lower
> internal resistance makes it possible for the camera to draw about
> 50% more current without causing the voltage droop that can lockup
> your camera. Well worth the lower capacity, IMHO.
>
> Kerry Frohling
> Fullerton, CA USA
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|