Thanks, Piers. I suppose that it wouldn’t be too bad to switch to LR, should
it come to that.
Chris
On 3 Jul 2014, at 09:54, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can't answer your fundamental question, Chris, but Lightroom does indeed act
> as you describe, import - non-destructive edit - output. It isn't restricted
> to that workflow (and one eventually discovers how flexible it can be). And
> it does provide DAM - in my view that is its fundamental offering, together
> with an interface (to the same raw converter as used by Photoshop) which is
> designed for photography rather than graphic arts more generally.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|