Subject: | Re: [OM] Digital Prints |
---|---|
From: | Clyde Soles <csoles@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 2 May 2001 08:40:16 -0600 |
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Winsor Crosby wrote: > On Roger Clark's web site, > http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/index.htm, he makes a comparison > between optical printing with an enlarger and a digital print on > Cibachrome. The digital print seems amazingly better. How is that > done? Is there something like a printer with a light head instead of > a print head? You can find some info on the technology on my web site (Photo Gallery > Prices). The real trick is in the scans. Not cheap but there is currently nothing better for quality prints. Clydeorama Photo Gallery http://clydesoles.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Digital Prints, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] UK shipments to Canada, John Hudson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital Prints, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | [OM] ***Sand in my lens***, Ez2endo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |