When I took the f1.2 Camellia stack, I also took one at f5.6. Not the careful researcher that I'd like to imagine I
might be, they were taken over an hour and a half apart, and the angles aren't quite the same. (It took me some time to
get enough slices @ f1.2.)
Still, I find the comparisons interesting and useful, so someone else may also .
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/Oly%20F1dot2s/Camelliadof.htm>
I do seem to have achieved one thing I was looking for, very deep DoF, with nice detail, but without edgy sharpness -
another tool in the kit. The f1.2 stack is now the background on my 24" monitor, and looks mighty nice. A largish print
may be in the offing.
Digging Deeper Moose
On 2/29/2024 9:10 PM, Moose wrote:
On 2/29/2024 4:05 PM, Wayne Shumaker wrote:
At 2/29/2024 04:28 PM, you wrote:
The Camellia by our front door "always" blooms in January. At least once, the
first blossom has opened on Jan 1st.
This year, it saved itself for Leap
Day.<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Olympus_List/Posts/Misc&image=2024-02-29%2014-53-51%20%28B%2CRadius2%2CSmoothing4%29cr.jpg>
At least this first one is upright, and tilted slightly toward the camera. Perfect pose.
🙂
Scattered Showers Moose
Nice portrait of the posee
Thanks
Was this stacked?
91 frames @ f1.2. I had to take care, so the tall stack wouldn't fall over. 😉
I had to stop myself from a little sharpening, as the point was very deep DoF, good detail, with no edginess. It's a
shot that really couldn't be made even just a few years ago. Outdoors, light rain and wind that got heavier just as I
finished.
Depth of Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
