You nailed my dilemma, Moose. After the slightly larger Fuji image, and
taking advantage of recent processing tools, my final cropped, processed
image is almost equal to the 50-200 result, with a lot less risk of
falling on rough ground while encumbered by heavier gear. I find myself
most often choosing the lighter package.
On 9/19/21 1:11 PM, Moose wrote:
On 9/16/2021 11:41 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
I went out in early afternoon with a longer lens and got a clearer
view of the Garden Spider's body. She has quite complex markings.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20210916-P9160747-Enhanced.JPG.html
Nice spider, well captured.
I see your dilemma. This longer FL shot shows little more detail that
the first one, and DoF limitations make the abdomen soft. Yet — the
E-M1 with 50-200 is a great deal larger and heavier than X-T2 with 18-55.
The smaller, lighter kit must be very appealing.
Sherpa Moose
--
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
