Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Window Shopping for cameras

Subject: Re: [OM] Window Shopping for cameras
From: Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:38:23 +0200
Well, having seen some of your (local) produce with the keenest interest, my 
take is that if you’re not going fuji GFX you’re fooling yourself, whatever the 
taxman says.

But I hope you’ll be happy with what you select, purchase, use, and the results 
of which you give us all too see, and oftentimes marvel at.

I know you won’t fail us ;-)

Amities

Philippe



> Le 30 avr. 2020 à 20:32, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> We've been saving up for a camera purchase at the end of the year.
> Unless we get sidewise with the taxman, or something else unforeseen
> occurs, I should be in the market for a new camera body around
> year-end. So, it's important to have a clue as to what I may be
> interested in getting.
> 
> For full-frame, the logical choice is a Sony. The sad thing, though,
> is that the Sonys I can afford are getting long-in-the-tooth and
> frankly are ergonomic disaster zones. The best way I can describe the
> A7 series is "industrial". Also, there is the aspect of compatibility
> with the OMZ lenses. I'm just not seeing the "You've GOT to get a Sony
> as it's cat's meow with adapted lenses". It may be, but I look for the
> "influencers" in this regard, and in most cases, they're shooting
> Canon. I want to want the Sony, but there is just something off about
> it. I just don't understand what it is yet.
> 
> That said, I've been considering other options. Honestly, the new
> Canon R series does have my attention, but no IBIS. I want IBIS. I can
> work around the image color thing, but the Canon is as exciting as a
> Toyota Camry.
> 
> I visited Stewart's Camera Store in Anchorage, yesterday, and spent
> some brief, but intense time with various m43 cameras. Instead of a FF
> camera, maybe a Metabones adapter is in my future. But only if the
> camera makes that compromise worthwhile. Having the GX85 is teaching
> me what I need in regards to EVF and a few other things.
> 
> The OMD-EM5 Mk3 is certainly a "logical" choice camera as it is an
> exceptional feature/price compromise. But the camera shape and balance
> with heavier lenses is a non-starter. I don't want just another
> variant of the GX85, I want something meaty. Outdoors in bright
> sunlight, the EVF was decent, but still difficult to work with. A
> competent camera and if it was my one-and-only camera with a few m43
> lenses, it would be all I need. It focused the hyper-slow 14-54 Mk1
> lens pretty fast. Manually focusing an OMZ 35-80/2.8 was OK, but I
> really wasn't sure when I nailed focus.
> 
> The OMD-EM1 Mk3 is a "wow" camera. It felt good and the viewfinder was
> exceptionally good out in the sun.... Uh, with a twist. I wear
> polarizing sunglasses and there was a cross-hatch darkening pattern
> that made viewing impossible. The EM5 didn't do the same, and it
> didn't darken when rotating the camera to vertical like the GX85 does,
> but neither Olympus was what I would call Polarizer Sunglass Friendly.
> But the contrast and brightness was REALLY good and closer to OVF than
> I've ever seen before. Surprisingly, the hyper-slow 14-54 Mk1 lens
> focused faster than on ANY other camera. As fast as the motor could
> move it, it focused--with no hunting at all. Boom! Manually focusing
> the OMZ 35-80/2.8 was better than the EM5, but I still wasn't
> convinced.
> 
> Then came the Panasonic G9. The viewfinder wasn't as bright and
> contrasty as the EM1's, but it is absolutely HUGE! Without a doubt,
> the G9's viewfinder is to EVF's what the OM series viewfinders were to
> SLRs. IMAX style viewfinder. It was also sunglass friendly. I did find
> the brightness and contrast in the bright sunlight to be not nearly as
> good as the EM1, but it was certainly usable. As to usability, that is
> easily the most comfortable camera (even without battery grip
> addition) and balances all lenses exceptionally well. The downside is
> that the camera took FOREVER to focus the 14-54 lens. Horribly bad.
> Manually focusing the OMZ 35-80/2.8 was "best of show". An absolute
> dream to manually focus adapted lenses. And there is focus peaking and
> what not to improve things further.
> 
> So, in conclusion, there is no conclusion. The hunt continues, but
> man-alive, the G9 is a REALLY good camera.
> 
> AG Schnozz
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz