| Subject: | Re: [OM] Tamron Lens |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Mar 2020 23:01:49 +0000 (UTC) |
| Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Piers, your hypothesis regarding why the 35-105/2.8 was not on the adaptall website seems spot on. I appreciate your thinking about that and posting. I enjoyed revisiting the 28-105 lens issues as well. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] self-isolating, Mike Lazzari |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] self-isolating, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Tamron Lens, Piers Hemy |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Now that we are on 3rd party cult classics, Mike Gordon via olympus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |