Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT: website template

Subject: Re: [OM] OT: website template
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 07:33:30 +0000
Jez

I do our village’s Neighbourhood Plan website – gamlingay-future.uk 
<http://gamlingay-future.uk/>.  It’s largely unpopulated at present, but that 
will change shortly.

However, I use RapidWeaver on a Mac to put together templates for websites, 
such as st-peters.uk <http://st-peters.uk/> and saintfrancis.uk 
<http://saintfrancis.uk/>.

I think that any template system, although simpler than coding with html and 
css (and php, perhaps), will take a bit of learning to exploit to its full.

Chris

> On 3 Dec 19, at 21:57, Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Ken. That’s an interesting idea. I’m going to have to poke around a
> bit to see if we can do a few things like a calendar and integration with
> Google maps. I’m also interested how to provide access to FB-deniers - and
> maybe email subscribers.
> Now to discuss with “the committee “...
> Many thanks
> Jez
> 
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 19:59, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> Sorry to jump in with an OT request, but our little village is looking to
>>> replace its website.  The current one is home-grown over many years but
>>> unmaintainable (and the guy who does it can't do it for much longer).
>>> Anyone have any experience of a simple/cheap template for a
>>> village/church/parish/social-club who can point me in the right
>> direction?
>> 
>> Yes!  I can tell you what the trend is right now. Facebook. No,
>> seriously! Facebook Pages have become the new normal in websites for
>> village/church/parish/social-club use.
>> 
>> My wife and I are involved in social-media presence for multiple
>> organizations and we're watching the almost total demise of the
>> website for this type of use. You can make the "site" on Facebook
>> public in a way that it's visible for non-Facebook users (all three of
>> them) and search engines. Depending on which entity it is we're
>> dealing with, we're seeing between 75% and 95% of the activity on the
>> Facebook Pages, and not the websites. Same content, same everything.
>> Actually, in one case, the website gets almost zero traffic--it's all
>> Facebook and Twitter. We only keep the domain because of email
>> addresses.
>> 
>> The 75% site is only that high because of legacy content.
>> 
>> AG Schnozz
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>> 
>> 
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz