Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Old Film Scanning

Subject: Re: [OM] Old Film Scanning
From: Rick Beckrich <rbeckrich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 16:46:00 -0500
Well done sir. Obviously, you came into the game with a very discerning eye
as well as a steady hand.

On Dec 17, 2016 3:26 PM, "Nathan Wajsman" <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This thread gives me an excuse to re-show some of my early efforts:
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/Other/Stuff-from-the-20th-century/ <
> http://www.greatpix.eu/Other/Stuff-from-the-20th-century/>
>
> I am pretty pleased with them, although of course a lot of editing has
> taken place.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <
> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <
> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <
> http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17 Dec 2016, at 21:05, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I've been cleaning house, and keep finding negatives from the past. I
> came
> >> to those same realizations - my percentage of "non-sucky' photos has
> gone
> >> wayyyyy up since I went digital and really started to pay attention and
> >> practice.
> >
> > I think my percentage of good pictures has gone way down, but I have
> > that delete button on the camera that allows me to destroy the
> > evidence immediately.
> >
> > The other thing to keep in mind is that these rolls of film were from
> > my early years of "trying to find my voice". There is a lot of poking
> > and prodding going on seeing what works and doesn't work. Plenty of
> > rookie mistakes. But also plenty of pictures that were NECESSARY to
> > take in order to become an acceptable photographer today. You have to
> > take pictures of stupid, mundane things in order to learn how to take
> > pictures of something important.
> >
> > This is not to say that everything is garbage. Far from it. But
> > finding the images that are standing the test of time is interesting.
> > I'm currently in the middle of a roll of Reala that is of something
> > that no longer exists. The historical significance far outweighs the
> > crooked horizons which can be fixed in Lightroom. With a little bit of
> > judicial editing, some of these have stock value.
> >
> > AG Schnozz
> > --
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> >
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz