| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM 55/1.2 |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:39:02 -0600 |
> Those with lanthanum glass (e.g. yellowing) are probably optically > sharper/better than those without, since generally the lanthanum type glass > was used because it had better optical properties (similar to how leaded > glass is/was better, despite falling out of favor for various reasons). Like killing its owners? AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] LED Stage Lighting and UV, Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: high-end compacts?, Dharma Singh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM 55/1.2, Sawyer, Edward |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM 55/1.2, Wayne Harridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |