On 8/25/2016 12:54 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
"MILC" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirrorless_interchangeable-lens_camera>
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/20/2016 5:09 PM, Philippe wrote:
. . .
I was a one time user of RFs, and all I could see was the lens through the VF
(the fuji X-Pro included) ;-)
Never like RFs. Got along with the XA, as a matter of necessity, but never
really liked it.
You are right, interchangeable lens RFs quality literally as MILCs, as the Wiki agrees. A pedant, should I locate one,
might object that they have mirrors in the RF mechanism, and part of the image you see through the VF is, in fact, reflex.
So from the definition and the purpose of the nowobsolete technology, any camera offering more than that is a bonus
and qualifies for me, note that I wrote for me, as a DSLR, be it mirrorless or not ;-)
And I may choose to call hippos giraffes, giraffes Renaults, lorries rhinos, and so on. I must, however expect to be
misunderstood regularly - and not know what hit me.
I like LV-ILCs
Who Dat Down 'Dere Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|