Thanks Moose & Chuck's comment.
I have re-edited it with increasing contrast and USM ......... how's the
effect?
Thanks.
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1498/23375280563_66f9e03bd1_o.jpg
Cheers,
Michael
On 27 December 2015 at 19:11, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Photographic unsharp masking?
> <
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking#Photographic_unsharp_masking
> >
>
> In short: A blurred positive made from the negative is sandwiched with
> the negative in the enlarger.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> On 12/27/2015 2:20 AM, Moose wrote:
>
>> On 12/26/2015 9:42 AM, Michael Wong wrote:
>>
>>> Originally no chair nearby the window, I thought the composition was too
>>> simple without an interest point. Moreover, I thought the "colour"
>>> will be
>>> too greyish if without the chair. Hence, I moved the chair "into" the
>>> picture and I waited the cloud covering sunny to keep more details on the
>>> chair before shooting.
>>>
>>
>> I like the subject(s) and composition quite a lot. It's the kind of
>> thing I could see on a gallery wall, or even mine.
>>
>> OTOH, overall, it seems mostly too flat for my taste, but with the chair
>> highlight detail invisible.
>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/MWong/Chair.htm>
>>
>> Now that's something I definitely could see on my wall. How one might do
>> something like this in the wet darkroom, I have don't really know.
>>
>> Snappier Moose
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
