Anyone got Stanley Kubrick’s phone number…?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.soultheft.com
> On 7 Dec 2015, at 3:04 pm, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Such would require a non-fisheye 7.5mm lens on full frame. I don't think
> we'll find one.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 12/6/2015 7:50 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> If the image had been a single image from an extremely wide angle lens what
>>> would have been the horizontal angle of image capture?
>>
>> About 135 degrees, from what I can judge from Google Earth.
>>
>>
>> Ken Norton
>> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.zone-10.com
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|