Which one? Assuming the K mount Takumar, there’s the original K mount which is
not small, the M type which is and the later A type. All three in front of me
now. I sell quite a few K1000’s at this time of year as they are regarded as
the classic student camera here and next year’s students come in looking for a
good one, sent by an art teacher who knows no better.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.soultheft.com
> On 4 Dec 2015, at 5:09 am, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Ken. I should have added a comment to view LARGE.
>
> I have always been pleased with the results I got from the Tak 50/1.4. It is
> small, and the focus is as smooth as warm butter. The focus, on the E-1,
> seems to be better defined than with the Leica lens.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> On 12/3/2015 12:04 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Channeling Moose's typical caveats about web-sized images, I like the
>> tone and the general contrast of the scenes. The first one has a nice
>> look to it where the leaves look like they are suspended out from my
>> monitor.
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|