But that was one of my points. Used 35mm tilt/shift lenses cost less
than the Cambo.
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/6/2015 10:20 AM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
They will have a larger than 44mm image circle, but would barely cover 645, if
that. RZ67 will cover 7x7cm at least.
The focal length difference can be made up for somewhat by having a larger
image area to shift around in. not completely of course, but for a lot less
than 35mm shift/tilt lenses go for probably.
On 10/6/15, 6:16 AM, "olympus on behalf of olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-bounces+ed.sawyer=unh.edu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But, being shift lenses they should have an adequate image circle even
if not as large. The main difference is availability of a 24mm focal
length vs 50mm minumum.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|