Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Digital Noise

Subject: Re: [OM] Digital Noise
From: ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:10:45 +0100
It would have been a great illustration if only he had been able to count the 
drops.  Because he couldn’t I felt that it was a rather pointless one.  And I 
come back to his definition of noise: the variation in numbers of drops doesn’t 
seem to me to be a clever way to describe it.

Chris

> On 22 Sep 15, at 01:13, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Actually, I rather liked the analogy of raindrops and the quantum nature of 
> light.  Made perfect sense to me.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> On 9/21/2015 5:25 PM, ChrisB wrote:
>> Not as far as I could tell, Moose. I didn't mind the article, but I didn't 
>> like his description of noise: the variation in light hitting the sensor.
>> 
>> I think that you'd enjoy reading it.
>> 
>> Chris
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz