Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Thursday Bird

from Moose

Subject:	Re: [OM] Thursday Bird
From:	Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2015 11:23:14 -0700

On 5/21/2015 6:34 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:

That lens is no turkey!  Great capture, detail.


Thanks, Jim!

No Turkey Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] will the LH-70C fit on the older 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 non-SWD lens?, Cyril Fernandez Re: [OM] will the LH-70C fit on the older 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 non-SWD lens?, philippe.amard Re: [OM] will the LH-70C fit on the older 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 non-SWD lens?, Moose Re: [OM] WAS - USED to BE - will the LH-70C fit on the older 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 non-SWD lens?, philippe.amard Re: [OM] WAS - USED to BE - will the LH-70C fit on the older 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 non-SWD lens?, Moose Re: [OM] WAS - USED to BE -, philippe.amard [OM] Thursday Bird, Moose Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Moose <= [OM] Converting Fuji RAF today, John Hudson Re: [OM] Converting Fuji RAF today, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] Converting Fuji RAF today, Philippe Re: [OM] Converting Fuji RAF today, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, ChrisB Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Moose Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Paul Braun Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Philippe Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Moose Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Moose

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Proud Pappa, Moose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Moose
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Thursday Bird, Jim Nichols
Next by Thread:	[OM] Converting Fuji RAF today, John Hudson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]