Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Processing X-trans was Re: OT: Recent debate on crop v FF - Mos

Subject: Re: [OM] Processing X-trans was Re: OT: Recent debate on crop v FF - Mosse
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:27:48 -0500
Very interesting. I’ve fallen into something approaching this not out of 
knowledge and wisdom, but rather dumb luck. And I still don’t take it where he 
does. But I shall go back to some of my X-100s files and give ‘em a go. Thanks 
for the link.

--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal

On Jan 19, 2015, at 9:59 AM, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> My experience differs but then as we are all different sometimes thats to be 
> expected. I never got on with oly files after the E-1, I found this on 
> sharpening X-trans files - I never knew about deconvolution built into the 
> detail slider in lightroom but it makes handling fuji raw files much easier.  
> certainly worth a read for all fuji shooters (and moose :-)  )
> 
> <http://petebridgwood.com/wp/2014/10/x-trans-sharpening/>
> 
>> Moose <mailto:olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
> 
>> I'm afraid none of this was in my thinking when I said that. What you say 
>> could indeed explain the overall softness, although I'd no go so far as 
>> 'watercolor effect'. My comment was far more empirical. Using deconvolution 
>> to 'recreate' details just seemed like more work than using NeatImage to 
>> push down noise and resharpen a little. Could be as much about my personal 
>> experience as anything.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz