>
>>Why would / how could ........... four images, one on top of each other,
>>be superior to a carefully taken single image of the same object ? The
>>object's slightest movement would surely have upset the clarity of the
>>final sandwiched images ?
>>
>>jh
>
>
>This may help explain. Here is a series of photos with different focal points
>and the resulting image stack. With something as small as an N-scale engine,
>you can't get the whole thing in focus and still have it large in the frame.
>
>http://forum.atlasrr.com/forum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=58021&;
>
That's an interesting method, particularly for objects that will not move
from one photo to the mext. For flowers, however, movement of the subject is
inevitable. For subjects such as that, a telephoto lens with a large aperture
is more practical.
Chris
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
- Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|