It is not Disneyland AG, none of the prospects/buyers was there when
you took the frame and will have a reference in mind.
And the nuked one is pleasant to view, the other one not.
Period?
Amities
Back to the basics of trade Philippe
Le 19 nov. 14 à 19:20, Ken Norton a écrit :
Are you listening, Brian?
There is also an interesting point to this which is hard for us to
accept. We photographers may like our pictures a certain way, but the
people writing the checks may like it an entirely different way.
I posted two extreme versions of the photograph--one with Chernobyl
settings, and the other straight with no adjustments at all. Nathan,
Moose and others made note that the straight version was the
preferred, or somehere in the middle. I personally prefer a middle-of
the road one, myself, and that's what I have had for a long time. But
the customers have spoken. Disneyland it is.
I would say, though, that the larger the print, the more toned down it
needs to be.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|