Le 17 juin 14 à 22:21, Ken Norton a écrit :
I'm reminded of "Bench Bob" and his medium-format digital backs,
Leicas and his Canons. Looking through his on-line images, I could
figure out what camera was used for almost all of the images. Without
a comparative, the Canons produced excellent results. But when
compared to the Leica and MFDB images, they appeared off. No amount of
calibration would make them look like anything different. I think that
CH Ling would agree.
It all depends on what you want to achieve - the right tool for the
right job was part of an earlier thread this week.
For instance I'm left untouched by most of the images I see from the
latest Leicas. The Monochrome above all; way too clinical; the results
look like an operation theater or an Audi interior ...
A good friend of mine used an M8 for years and I loved what he shared.
He's been using an M9 for a while and his photographs have lost part
of their soul, go figure.
But I love Bob's benches - he uses the right tools for the right job.
Amities
Philippe
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|