I have heard that, John. I’d rather like it, but the capital for it is not
readily available for re-allocation :-)
Chris
On 27 May 2014, at 00:13, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bob ..... you would want to retire your 90 / f2 . The Fuji 56mm is a stunner
> and I don't say that lightly.
>
> jh
>
> On 5/26/2014 7:07 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> The intuitive answer is that the Zuiko prevailed, as that is a lens of
>> legend anyway, but I have profound respect for Fuji glass.
>>
>> --Bob Whitmire
>> Certified Neanderthal
>>
>> On May 26, 2014, at 4:38 PM, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I did a brief test of a Zuiko sitting on an X Pro 1 using a Novoflex FUX /
>>> OM Made in Germany adapter
>>>
>>> Lens used : Zuiko 90 / f2 macro
>>>
>>> and compared the result with the same shot taken with a Fuji 56mm / f1.2
>>>
>>> Lighting conditions .... overcast but bright late afternoon light ......
>>> shutter speed, aperture and ISO were identical for each shot.
>>>
>>> Visual comparison done on a 21" x 12" monitor.
>>>
>>> Would anyone like to speculate on the results?
>>>
>>> jh
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|