Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Better late? [was DX 14-54 on MFT]

Subject: Re: [OM] Better late? [was DX 14-54 on MFT]
From: DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 09:25:26 -0500
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Moose de Worm <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All digital cameras I've used have little pixel level artifacts I call
> worms. Hardly ever noticeable in contemporary bodies at base ISO, they
> increase in number/size/intensity as the ISO goes up. It's easy to miss
> them in noisy files, then they show up after NR. It's also easy to think
> they are artifacts of the NR. However, when flipping the NR layer off and
> on, it becomes apparent that they were there all along, simply masked by
> the noise.
>
> The GX7 has considerably less of this problem at any given ISO than the
> E-M5. Otherwise, the image IQ seems the same to me.
>

Do I assume correctly that the artifact is a permanent and irreparable
feature of increased ISO sensitivity?

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz