| Subject: | Re: [OM] Photorealism |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:29:27 -0800 |
On 1/11/2014 10:19 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote: > I don't really see the point - why not just take a photograph. Very clever > but not well used. 'Real' realism is someone like precisionist Jeffry Smart > who creates highly detailed paintings of scenes which are stripped, minimal > and precise in a way that photographs can almost never be. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Smart > One of his best known early paintings - > http://resources2.news.com.au/images/2011/11/11/1226193/110158-111111jeffrey-smart.jpg That one really reminds me of the 'look' of highly cropped images from the Canon A710. Who Cares Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] New Yorker article--Goodbye, Cameras, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Photorealism, Wayne Harridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Photorealism, Andrew Fildes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Photorealism, Wayne Harridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
