Exactly. It is currently fashionable in my good-ole US of A to vie for who can
throw the highest number of low-to-no income types under the bus. Sometimes I
think these pillocks want to return the US to a mid-Victorian British society,
where a few have everything and a lot have nothing and only a few even
recognize, much less want to correct, the discrepancy. I would really think
this was true if I could be assured those Tea Party scunners actually knew what
mid-Victorial British society was like.
(Thank you, United Kingdom, for adding to my repertoire of insults to hurl
rightward. <g>)
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Dec 13, 2013, at 2:55 AM, SwissPace wrote:
> I think the super rich - I would save "well to do" for the middle
> classes could handle any kicking just fine, it's the kicking of people
> when they are down that I object to!
>
>
> On 12/12/2013 14:58, John Hudson wrote:
>> What is missing in the 9 out of 10 Americans piece is any mention of what is
>> written in the first paragraph of the following piece:
>>
>> http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/cbotop-40-paid-1062-income-taxes-bottom-40-paid-91-got-average-18950
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|