Yes, good eye. I hadn't noticed them at first and had to look to find
them but they are certainly there. I wonder how many abnormalities my
own images have that I just haven't noticed.
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/27/2013 10:15 PM, DZDub wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Paul Braun <pbraun42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/13 09:21 : , Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> Good luck. I see you have your competition cut out for you. I liked
>>> all of Hooker's shots. The snakes were a bit of a surprise. I think
>>> they're likely yellow rat snakes but I can't tell for sure.
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I agree. His work is very nice. Except.. did anyone else notice the
>> "hot" pixels in this shot?
>>
>> http://chuck-hooker.squarespace.com/6rpi62suoynqgjb5m7o8f3gf11x1ug
>>
>> That the same thing my E-1 started to do, until someone finally told me
>> to run the pixel-mapping utility and they all went away. I only had
>> three or four - they're all over this image.
>
>
> Good eye, Paul. I think that is long-exposure noise, rather than errant
> pixels.
>
> Joel W.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|