Thanks, Chuck. Took another look today. Lots of blooms, no insects. :~(
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Rose of Sharon - for Moose
> Eh? No apologies required for that one. Looks just right to me.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/27/2013 3:10 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Moose,
>>
>> I went back to the RAW file and reprocessed the Rose of Sharon image,
>> keeping your comments in mind. With the backlighted flower, it was
>> difficult to get enough surface lighting without blowing the brighter
>> areas. I worked the best compromise I could, without resorting to
>> masking, layers, etc. I have replaced the original image with the new
>> one. The link is the same.
>>
>> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=6315
>>
>> It has richer tones, but is pretty dark.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|