>
>Returned a couple weeks ago from Utah though only processed a few and
>scanned one roll.
>Had not been there in many moons and many towns were dry. A few
>microbreweries have sprung up.
>Found one brew of moderate note in my modest sample size:
>
>http://www.olyendomike.com/Travel/Utah-2013/29032801_4n5j6t#!i=2469695540&k=VbH7TNw&lb=1&s=L
>
>Poured very dark, Italian roast like; deep, dark, mysterious. Redish
>tones if held up to the light. Head was beige and about a fingers
>breath and left some lacing.
>Aroma is impressive with dark roasted malt, chocolate overtones, very
>mellow. If scored by observation and olfaction only would be
>exceptional.
>Upon drinking, leaves an impression of being bit too light to the
>palate for this style. Roasted malt, nuttiness, sliver of chocolate but
>overall too thin. Still very enjoyable considering the other options.
>Mitt's favorite brew I wonder?
>
I remember when this beer first appeared. They had slogans like "Take one
home for the wives" and "The one to have when you're having more than one".
Clever. I'm surprised that the church didn't excommunicate them.
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|