If you're using a watermark to make it difficult to steal your work it
has to be annoying as Bob said. Nothing wrong with that at all. If
it's so easy to clone out, why bother. I knew someone who put her
"best" work up on the net in huge files and was shocked when someone
stole it. It's okay to have an obtrusive watermark.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
www.zuiko.com | omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Olympus OM Service since 1977
On 4/30/2013 1:18 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> It's an excellent rendition of an exceptional moment. As for the
> watermark, it easily could be cloned or cropped out with not much
> lost, at least in the opinion of anyone stealing the image.
> Unfortunately, for watermarks to be effective, they have to be
> incredibly intrusive and excruciatingly annoying.
>
> But then that's just me.
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Paul Braun wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> PESO:
>>>
>>> Finally scanning B&W of the schools.
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/149934704
>>>
>>
>> Yes. There's a little boy who's really really REALLY trying hard
>> to make something happen...
>>
>> Watermark is fine.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|